Theresa May said the UK cannot expect to hold on to “bits” of its membership after leaving the EU. The prime minister’s comment came after she was asked whether she would “prioritise” controlling immigration over staying in the single market.
She told Sky News her approach was not “muddled”, following criticism by the UK’s former EU ambassador. Mrs May, whose critics have demanded more detail of her aims, promised to provide this in “the coming weeks”.
Labour though, urged the prime minister to give “more clarity” ahead of the “most important negotiations for a generation”. Brexit talks with the EU are expected to begin as early as April. There has been much debate in recent weeks about the nature of the deal the government is aiming for, in particular whether controls on the movement of EU citizens will mean the UK leaves the European single market and customs union.
Theresa May doesn’t like to give a running commentary on Brexit, so you have to read between the lines on this one. While she didn’t go as far as to say she would ditch single market access in favour of being free to control EU immigration, she certainly appeared to hint at it.
Mrs May said the UK would have control of its borders and the best possible trade deal with the EU. She didn’t commit to maintaining “single market access”, and she suggested that people who thought the country could keep “bits of EU membership” were missing the point that it “would be leaving”.
This failure to commit to the single market will be music to the ears of Brexiteers. To Remainers it will raise concerns that a “hard Brexit” could be on the offing. But, as with so much in the Brexit debate, clarity over the UK’s position in the negotiations, due to start very soon, remains lacking.
Sir Ivan Rogers, who resigned as the UK’s ambassador to the EU last week, criticised “muddled thinking” among ministers.
But Mrs May told Sky News’s Sophy Ridge on Sunday: “Anybody who looks at this question of free movement and trade as a sort of zero-sum game is approaching it in the wrong way.
“I’m ambitious for what we can get for the UK in terms of our relationship with the European Union because I also think that’s going to be good for the European Union. Our thinking on this isn’t muddled at all.”
The prime minister has promised to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty – getting formal Brexit negotiations with the EU under way – by the end of March.
Asked whether she was “prepared to prioritise full control over immigration above membership of the single market”, Mrs May said: “Often people talk in terms as if somehow we are leaving the EU, but we still want to kind of keep bits of membership of the EU.
“We are leaving. We are coming out. We are not going to be a member of the EU any longer.
“So the question is what is the right relationship for the UK to have with the European Union when we are outside. We will be able to have control of our borders, control of our laws.
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said Mrs May’s comments “confirmed she is taking us towards a disastrous hard Brexit that will leave our country poorer and more divided”.
But Richard Tice, co-chairman of the Leave Means Leave campaign, said: “We welcome the prime minister’s commitment to taking back control of Britain’s borders, therefore ending preferential treatment for EU citizens.
“She is right that issues of trade and immigration are not binary because when Britain leaves the single market and the customs union, though freedom of movement will cease, Britain’s ability to trade with the EU and access the single market will continue.”
Labour MP and leading supporter of pro-EU Open Britain group, Chuka Umunna, said:”Any trading arrangement outside the single market would erect barriers with our largest trading partner and would be disastrous for the UK economy, jobs and businesses.”
Europhile former Conservative chancellor Ken Clarke told BBC One’s Andrew Marr Show: “Theresa needs to address the more serious question of the muddle [Sir Ivan is] complaining about, see whether she agrees with him and decide whether she can improve the way in which she organises the government to get to a proper conclusion.”