If administration loses looming Supreme Court case on ObamaCare, what’s next?

The fact that the Supreme Court is reviewing a key component of the Affordable Care Act is raising questions about what would happen if the Obama administration loses. On March 4, the Supreme Court will be asked to decide whether the IRS illegally extended subsidies to millions of Americans in order to underwrite the cost of their health insurance policies under ObamaCare.

The law specifically states:

All subsidies will be awarded in states that set up their own exchanges, but more than three dozen states opted not to do that. Despite that fact, the IRS extended subsidies into those states.

But Obama is giving the subsidies also to those exchanges controlled by the feds. Should the Supreme Court rule against Obama, all those who got subsidies would have to pay the money back.

Earlier this month, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell told a Senate committee that a decision from the Court striking down the current subsidy structure would be “devastating,” but refused to say if the administration has a back-up plan.

Some conservatives see that as an opening.

Grace-Marie Turner, founder of the Galen Institute, which advocates for free market health care reform, said GOP leaders are ready to step in.

Galen also said lawmakers could offer a temporary solution that would give states more control over subsidies, but stop short of gutting the ACA.

“I do think there’s a chance that if they do this right, if they play their cards right, that the president would, in fact, sign it,” Turner added.

Fox News

Some ACA critics fear the Supreme Court may hesitate to block the current subsidies because of a lack of confidence in the legislative branch in general.

In an interview earlier this week, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg summed up her thoughts on Congress’ ability to step in where laws need to be updated or fixed.

“The current Congress is not equipped really to do anything,” she said.

Fox News

So don’t be surprised folks, if the court deliberately sides in with Odummer.

The Justices have extended oral arguments from the usual one-hour limit to 2.5 hours, with a decision due by late June.

The number of uninsured could rise by 8 million if the subsidies disappear, two independent think tanks have estimated.

“We have to have a contingency plan,” House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said last week.

Fox News

Republicans and Democrats agree that a ruling for the plaintiffs could wipe out subsidies for millions of Americans, in three-fourths of U.S. states.

One response

  1. More Like, What Laws Can Be Fixed Their Way, Syndrome. Royal Screwing For All Americans, Legal Ones That Is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: